Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller said on October 6 the Russian gas monopoly has almost halved the planned capacity of its controversial Turkish Stream gas pipeline project to 32 billion cubic metres per year from an original capacity of 63 billion cubic metres

Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller said on October 6 the Russian gas monopoly has almost halved the planned capacity of its controversial Turkish Stream gas pipeline project to 32 billion cubic metres per year from an original capacity of 63 billion cubic metres.

After Russia scrapped the South Stream pipeline, Gazprom has pushed ahead with Turkish Stream that is also planning to bring gas to Europe bypassing Ukraine.

Addressing an industry conference on October 6, Miller said Gazprom now planned to supply up to 32 billion cubic metres (bcm) via Turkish Stream because it also plans to build the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline, which runs on the bed of the Baltic Sea to Germany.

“Speaking about designed capacity … we can talk that it will be created at volumes of up to 32 bcm,” Miller said, adding that the reduction in capacity was linked to Gazprom’s plans related to Nord-Stream-2.

Russia signed recently an agreement with five European companies to increase the capacity of the Nord Stream pipeline from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea to 110 billion cubic metres per year from as early as 2019.

Alexander Kornilov, a senior oil and gas analyst at Moscow’s Alfa Bank, told New Europe by phone on October 6 that halving the planned capacity of Turkish Stream to 32 billion cubic metres “has been widely anticipated” after Gazprom signed some agreements with its European partners regarding Nord Stream-2 and some cooling down in the talks between Moscow and Ankara after the change of the political landscape in Turkey.

“Given the slowdown in the realisation by Gazprom of Turkish Stream after in fact they slowed down significantly the process during the summer period, I think all these things demonstrated already that probably the initial capacity of 63 bcm looks pretty unachievable in the future,” Kornilov said.

“It’s not really a big surprise for the market and for now I think definitely the project looks more affordable than 63 bcm so that’s definitely much easier to conduct compared to the full capacity one in terms of both capability of Gazprom and also the ability of Gazprom to raise project financing from the guys in Europe and Turkey,” the Alfa Bank analyst noted.

Gazprom had originally planned to supply Europe with a total 63 billion cubic metres by 2020 via Turkish Stream, with the first line of 15.75 billion cubic metres designed for Turkey and the rest to be delivered on the Greek-Turkish border and then onwards to Europe. “The key distinction from South Stream is that Gazprom has agreed to run Nord Stream-2,” Kornilov said.

Gazprom has earlier said it would have to postpone the launch of Turkish Stream as Moscow and Ankara did not sign an intergovernmental deal, essential for construction to start. Turkey holds new parliamentary elections November 1. “It’s not an agreed project already. It’s still up in the air. Russia still needs to talk to Turkey but that’s hardly possible before the dust settles in terms of the political landscape in Turkey and before the new government, the new cabinet takes shape. That means Russia doesn’t have much chance to continue these talks before the beginning of next year,” Kornilov said.

Russia and Turkey are also at odds over Russian President Vladimir Putin’s decision to start air strikes in Syria, which Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on October 4 said was a “grave mistake”.

Turkey will probably continue purchasing 15 billion cubic metres of natural gas and the remainder will be transferred to the Balkans, Kornilov said. “That’s still feasible. It depends on the negotiations with the local countries and the local companies operating in those countries that we have already seen. Greece definitely supports this idea especially given that Russia wants to support Greece with financing and some other things going forward. But as far as that Balkans are concerned here we have seen not straight forward reaction of local authorities,” Kornilov said, adding that while some countries have shown interest, other countries like FYROM, for example, “has not said ‘yes’”. “The situation still remains to be seen how it develops,” he said. The Russian expert also stressed that the response of the European Commission will also play a key role for extending the Turkish pipeline to Europe.

http://neurope.eu/article/gazprom-halves-turkish-stream-capacity/